Journal of Global Health: Home Journal of Global Health
Watch: Survival: The Story of Global Health - FREE
JoGH Recommends:

Peer Review Conference



Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License
.



Kit Yee Chan, Xin–wei Yu, Jia–peng Lu, Alessandro Rhyll Demaio, Kirsty Bowman, and Evropi Theodoratou

Abstract

Background

Infectious causes of childhood deaths in the world have decreased substantially in the 21st century. This trend has exposed accidental deaths as an increasingly important future challenge. Presently, little is known about the cause structure of accidental childhood deaths in low– and middle–income country (LMIC) settings. In this paper, we aim to establish cause structure for accidental deaths in children aged 0–4 years in China in the year 2010.

Methods

In this paper, we explored the database of 208 multi–cause child mortality studies in Chinese that formed a basis for the first published estimate of the causes of child deaths in China (for the year 2008). Only five of those studies identified specific causes of accidental deaths. Because of this, we searched the Chinese medical literature databases CNKI and WanFang for single–cause mortality studies that were focused on accidental deaths. We identified 71 further studies that provided specific causes for accidental deaths. We used epidemiological modeling to estimate the number of accidental child deaths in China in 2010 and to assign those deaths to specific causes.

Results

In 2010, we estimated 314 581 deaths in children 0–4 years in China, of which 31 633 (10.1%) were accidental. Accidental deaths contributed 7240 (4.0%) of all deaths in neonatal period, 8838 (10.5%) among all post–neonatal infant deaths, and 15 554 (31.7%) among children with 1–4 years of age. Among four tested models, the most predictive was used to establish the likely cause structure of accidental deaths in China. We estimated that asphyxia caused 9490 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8224–11 072), drowning 5694 (95% CI 5061–6327), traffic accidents 3796 (95% CI 3163–4745), poisoning 3163 (95% CI 2531–3796) and falls 2531 (95% CI 2214–3163) deaths. Based on medians from a few rare studies, we also predict 633 (95% CI:316–1265) deaths to be due to burns and 316 (95% CI 0–633) due to falling objects. Together, these 7 causes explain more than 80% of all accidental deaths when modeling is primarily used, and more than 95% when the analysis is based purely on medians from the 76 available studies.

Conclusions

Reduction in global child mortality is a leading political priority and accidental deaths will soon emerge as one of the main challenges. In this paper we provided a detailed breakdown of causes of these deaths in a large middle–income country. We noted that, wherever the share of accidental deaths among all child deaths is increased, drowning is more likely to be the leading cause; asphyxia seems to be equally important in all contexts, while traffic accidents, poisoning and falls are relatively more important in contexts where the overall share of accidents to all child deaths is low.


Infectious causes of childhood deaths in the world have decreased substantially in the 21st century [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF and Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) estimated that the number of child deaths globally decreased from about 10.8 million in the year 2000 to about 7.6 million in the year 2010 and the majority of the reduction is attributable to fewer deaths from common childhood infections, such as pneumonia and diarrhoea [2,3]. This trend has exposed accidental deaths as an increasingly important future challenge. In 2000 accidents were estimated to contribute 3% to the total number of child deaths globally and in 2010 this increased to 5% [2,3]. In China, as perhaps the best example of a large middle–income country, these trends were even more pronounced. The child mortality decreased by nearly 75% between 2000 and 2010 and CHERG estimated that the proportion of accidental deaths in China increased from 9% to 11% during the same period [4]. To address the emerging challenge of childhood accidental deaths, more information is required on the specific causes and patterns of their occurrence in different contexts. Presently, little is known about the cause structure of accidental childhood deaths in low– and middle–income country (LMIC) settings.

In 2008, the WHO estimated up to 950 000 fatalities from injuries for children aged 0–18 years globally [5]. In the same year, WHO and UNICEF published their landmark World report on child injury prevention [6]. It was estimated that some 90% of these deaths were attributable to unintentional injuries [5] and that 95% of injury–related deaths in children occurred in LMIC [5,6]. The recent WHO's World Health Statistics 2013 shows that the percentage distribution of injuries for the under five mortality has increased across all sub–categories by age and income from 2000 to 2010 [57]. However, information on fatal injuries from LMIC is often derived from medical facilities, thus underestimating the population–based burden [8]. This problem is made worse because definitions for injury mechanisms have not been uniform across different study settings. They can particularly vary with regards to drowning, burns, poisonings, and what is defined as “other unintentional injuries” [911].

There is persisting uncertainty over the estimates of accidental child deaths globally. In many low and middle-income regions, accidents are relatively rare among other causes of child deaths, contributing only several percents. This makes them prone to greater over– or under–estimation in multi–cause models, such as those used by CHERG, in comparison to the more frequent causes of death. Recently, an increased number of single–cause studies focused on accidents as causes of deaths in developing countries have been published, which is especially true for China. Previous results from a multi–cause model from China have already suggested a possible under–estimation of accidents and injuries as a cause of child deaths globally [4]. Better understanding of specific cause composition of accidental childhood deaths would reaffirm previous reports and assist in developing strategies and policies that could prevent these deaths in different LMIC contexts.

This study has four aims: (1) To estimate the total number of accidental deaths in children under five years in 2010 among neonates, post–neonatal infants, and children aged 1–4 years in all Chinese provinces; (2) to estimate the relative contribution of accidents to all child deaths in each of these age groups; (3) to define a specific cause to all accidental childhood deaths in China; and (4) to investigate if there are any significant context–related predictors of the proportional contribution of specific causes to the overall number of deaths due to accidents.

METHODS

In terms of methods, this study is an extension of our previous study on the causes of child deaths in China in 2008, where a systematic review of Chinese literature was performed and then followed by epidemiological modeling [4]. In that study, we identified 206 multi–cause studies published between 2000 and 2008 that contributed information on a very large number of childhood deaths (about 350 000 in total) that had an exact cause assigned. That information allowed us to develop models that related the proportional contribution of each major cause of child deaths to the underlying context–specific under–five mortality rate (U5MR) [4]. If the U5MR for the whole of China is known, then the same models can be applied to estimate the proportional contribution of different causes to all child deaths in China in any given calendar year for which U5MR is available. Moreover, if the number of livebirths is also available for the same calendar year of interest, then the U5MR and proportions attributable to different causes can be translated into absolute number of deaths due to each cause [4].

To address the first aim of this study – ie, to estimate the total number of accidental deaths in children under five years of age in China in 2010 among neonates, post–neonatal infants, and children aged 1–4 years in all Chinese provinces – we needed to obtain the U5MR for China in the year 2010. This was available from the CHERG national–level estimate of the causes of child deaths for the year 2010 [3]. Using the same models as in our previous paper on the causes of child deaths in China in 2008, we estimated the proportional cause contribution in the year 2010 by province and 3 major age groups: neonates (0–28 days), post–neonatal infants (1–11 months), and children aged 1–4 years. We presented the results in Table 1 , showing the distribution for all deaths and specifically for accidental deaths.

Table 1.  Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG)'s estimates of the number of deaths in China in the year 2010 by province among neonates, post–neonatal infants, children aged 1–4 y and 0–4 y (columns 2–5) and the number of those deaths attributable to accidents (columns 6–9)*
Total number of deaths in each province by age group Number of accidental deaths in each province by age group
Province Neonatal 1 month – 1 year 1–4 years Total Neonatal 1 month – 1 year 1–4 years Total
Anhui 10 165 4638 2771 17574 407 500 880 1787
Beijing 370 97 118 585 15 16 45 75
Chongqing 3100 1256 880 5235 124 149 293 566
Fujian 3715 1422 1074 6212 149 176 365 690
Gansu 3589 1610 984 6183 144 176 315 634
Guangdong 6636 2097 2025 10757 265 298 731 1295
Guangxi Zhuang AR 10 098 4569 2761 17 428 404 496 880 1780
Guizhou 12 927 7504 3197 23 628 517 650 908 2076
Hainan 1703 791 461 2955 68 84 145 298
Hebei 13 542 6418 3640 23 600 542 670 1138 2349
Heilongjiang 4673 2343 1229 8245 187 233 375 795
Henan 9090 3234 2685 15009 364 423 935 1721
Hubei 5311 2145 1509 8965 212 255 503 970
Hunan 7487 3024 2128 12639 299 360 709 1368
Jiangsu 4109 1246 1266 6621 164 182 463 809
Jiangxi 9304 4463 2489 16256 372 461 774 1607
Jilin 1119 327 348 1794 45 49 129 222
Liaoning 2530 924 742 4195 101 119 256 476
Neimenggu (Inner Mongolia) AR 2703 1223 739 4666 108 133 236 476
Ningxia Hui AR 1475 744 387 2606 59 74 118 250
Qinghai 1278 607 343 2228 51 63 107 222
Shaanxi (Qin) 6049 3165 1564 10778 242 303 468 1012
Shandong 8913 3485 2560 14958 357 425 863 1644
Shanghai 275 61 91 426 11 11 36 58
Shanxi (Jin) 5608 2726 1493 9828 224 278 461 964
Sichuan 24 624 14 329 6083 45 035 985 1238 1726 3950
Tianjin 360 92 115 567 14 15 44 73
Xinjiang Wei AR 7701 4189 1959 13848 308 386 575 1269
Xizang (Tibet) AR 809 430 208 1447 32 41 62 135
Yunnan 8480 4169 2248 14897 339 422 691 1452
Zhejiang 3256 1209 950 5414 130 153 326 609
Age–specific total for China 180 998 84 535 49 048 314 581 7240 8838 15 554 31 633
% of total for China 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4.0% 10.5% 31.7% 10.1%

*These CHERG estimates [3] are based on models for China for the year 2008 that were explained in detail by Rudan et al. [4].



To achieve the second aim – ie, to estimate the relative contribution of accidents to all child deaths in each of these age groups, we simply applied all previously developed models [4] to the number of livebirths in China in 2010 and U5MR in 2010, both of them provided from the same sources as in the previous study [1,3,12,13]. We then divided the total number of estimated accidental deaths by the total number of deaths due to all causes in 3 major age groups: neonates (0–28 days), post–neonatal infants (1–11 months), and children aged 1–4 years. We also performed these calculations for the whole period 0–4 years and presented the results in Table 1 .

To achieve the third aim – to define a specific cause to all accidental childhood deaths in China – we required additional information on the specific causes of accidental deaths, which we did not acquire in our previous study on the causes of child deaths in China [4]. To obtain this information, we first reviewed all 206 multi–cause studies published 2000–2008 to identify those that reported accidents as causes of child deaths and we identified 106 such studies. Then, we reviewed those studies for a more specific breakdown of causes of such deaths, but only 5 of 106 studies provided this information. This necessitated a new review of the literature in search of single–cause studies on accidental childhood deaths that provided a detailed breakdown by cause. We repeated the search of the literature using the same procedure as in our previous paper [4], with the only difference that we added the search terms “accidents” and/or “injuries”. This allowed us to identify 71 further studies, nearly all of them from CNKI and Wan Fang databases. Adding the five multi–cause studies from the original review [4], this allowed us to reach a total of 76 studies with useful information. Among them, 67 reported drowning and asphyxia as specific causes, 66 reported traffic accidents, 61 reported falls, 50 reported at least one death due to poisoning, 11 reported burns and 4 reported falling objects. All other causes were sporadic and mentioned only as a rare observation in a single study. From all 76 studies it was possible to compute proportional contributions of these causes to all accidental deaths. For each specific cause we presented median proportion, inter–quartile range (IQR) and maximum and minimum observed percentage in a box–and–whiskers plot in Figure 1 .

Figure 1.  Box and whiskers plot of the proportions (Y–axis) of accidental childhood deaths in China in 2010 by specific causes (X–axis): medians, inter–quartile ranges, maximum and minimum value observed in the studies that provided adequate information. The number of studies available for each cause ranged from 4 to 67 and is presented below X–axis.
jogh-05-010413-F1.png


Finally, the fourth aim of our study was to investigate if there are any significant context–related predictors of the proportional contribution of specific causes to the overall number of deaths due to accidents. This aim should inform us whether we can predict the proportional contribution of different specific causes if we have other information about the context. We could specify three different predictors that were available at the provincial level: (i) overall U5MR; (ii) U5MR that is due to all accidental deaths; and (iii) proportional contribution of accidental deaths to all deaths in each province. We used regression analysis and three separate models to explore whether any of these three predictor variables are significantly associated with proportion of any specific cause in all accidental deaths. We also added the fourth model, where we used multivariate design to account for all three predictors at the same time. We used those four models to predict the proportional contribution of the five specific causes with sufficient information available: drowning, asphyxia, traffic accidents, falls and poisoning. In performing these analyses, we followed all procedures as detailed in our previous paper [4]. We presented a summary of the four models applied to five specific causes of accidental deaths in Table 2 and Figures 2 to 6 Figure 3Figure 4Figure 5Figure 6.

Table 2.  A summary of results of epidemiological modeling: association between proportion of deaths due to each specific accidental cause (criterion variable) and four different predictor variables
Model Coefficient
(β) Adjusted R2
Cause of death: drowning (n = 67 studies)
ln (U5MR) 0.05 –0.01
ln (U5AMR) 0.25 0.10
ln (%ACC in total) 0.95 0.36
ln (all three predictors) –0.81 0.35
Cause of death: asphyxia (n = 67 studies)
ln (U5MR) 0.006 –0.015
ln (U5AMR) –0.02 –0.013
ln (%ACC in total) –0.11 –0.002
ln (all three predictors) 0.35 –0.03
Cause of death: falls (n = 61 studies)
ln (U5MR) –0.12 0.01
ln (U5AMR) –0.24 0.14
ln (%ACC in total) –0.59 0.23
ln (all three predictors) 1.39 0.24
Cause of death: traffic accidents (n = 67 studies)
ln (U5MR) –0.43 0.24
ln (U5AMR) –0.43 0.34
ln (%ACC in total) –0.49 0.10
ln (all three predictors) –1.02 0.32
Cause of death: poisoning (n = 50 studies)
ln (U5MR) –0.05 –0.02
ln (U5AMR) –0.29 0.10
ln (%ACC in total) –1.01 0.37
ln (all three predictors) 0.03 0.34

U5MR – under–five mortality rate (all deaths included) reported in each study, U5AMR – under–five mortality rate based on accidental deaths reported in each study, %ACC in total – the proportion of accidental deaths in all deaths in each study, β – regression coefficient, R2 – the proportion of variance in the criterion variable explained by each predictor variable



Figure 2.  Epidemiological modeling of the association between the most significant predictor variable (proportion of accidental deaths in all child deaths in each study; X–axis) and criterion variable (proportion of deaths caused by drowning in all accidental deaths; Y–axis). Data points represent studies with available information and the size of the “bubbles” is proportional to the total number of child deaths observed in each study. The regression line with upper and lower limit of 95% confidence interval is shown across the range of data.
jogh-05-010413-F2.png


Figure 3.  Epidemiological modeling of the association between the most significant predictor variable (proportion of accidental deaths in all child deaths in each study; X–axis) and criterion variable (proportion of deaths caused by asphyxia in all accidental deaths; Y–axis). Data points represent studies with available information and the size of the “bubbles” is proportional to the total number of child deaths observed in each study. The regression line with upper and lower limit of 95% confidence interval is shown across the range of data.
jogh-05-010413-F3.png


Figure 4.  Epidemiological modeling of the association between the most significant predictor variable (proportion of accidental deaths in all child deaths in each study; X–axis) and criterion variable (proportion of deaths caused by falls in all accidental deaths; Y–axis). Data points represent studies with available information and the size of the “bubbles” is proportional to the total number of child deaths observed in each study. The regression line with upper and lower limit of 95% confidence interval is shown across the range of data.
jogh-05-010413-F4.png


Figure 5.  Epidemiological modeling of the association between the most significant predictor variable (proportion of accidental deaths in all child deaths in each study; X–axis) and criterion variable (proportion of deaths caused by traffic accidents in all accidental deaths; Y–axis). Data points represent studies with available information and the size of the “bubbles” is proportional to the total number of child deaths observed in each study. The regression line with upper and lower limit of 95% confidence interval is shown across the range of data.
jogh-05-010413-F5.png


Figure 6.  Epidemiological modeling of the association between the most significant predictor variable (proportion of accidental deaths in all child deaths in each study; X–axis) and criterion variable (proportion of deaths caused by poisoning in all accidental deaths; Y–axis). Data points represent studies with available information and the size of the “bubbles” is proportional to the total number of child deaths observed in each study. The regression line with upper and lower limit of 95% confidence interval is shown across the range of data.
jogh-05-010413-F6.png


Having completed the analyses towards the third and the fourth aim, it was possible to predict the absolute number of accidental deaths due to each of the specific causes in China in 2010 in two main ways: (i) using median proportional contributions and IQRs from all available studies and applying them to estimates of all accidental deaths in China; or (ii) using the model that explained the largest proportion of variance and applying it to the entire Chinese population. We presented a comparison of these two approaches in Table 3 .

Table 3.  Estimates of the number of child deaths in China in 2010 attributable to different causes of accidental deaths*
Causes of accidental death in children aged 0–4 y in China in 2010 Based on median
(with IQR) No. (deaths) Based on model
(with 95% CI) No. (deaths)
All accidental deaths 100% 31 633 100% 31 633
Drowning (n = 67 studies) 34% (17–47%) 10755 (5378–14867) 18% (16–20%) 5694 (5061–6327)
Asphyxia (n = 67 studies) 30% (21–36%) 9490 (6643–11 388) 30% (26–35%) 9490 (8224–11 072)
Falls (n = 61 studies) 11% (6–16%) 3480 (1898–5061) 8% (7–10%) 2531 (2214–3163)
Traffic accidents (n = 66 studies) 11% (6–16%) 3480 (1898–5061) 12% (10–15%) 3796 (3163–4745)
Poisoning (n = 50 studies) 6% (4–11%) 1898 (1265–3480) 10% (8–12%) 3163 (2531–3796)
Burns (n = 11 studies) 2% (1–4%) 633 (316–1265) N/A N/A
Falling objects (n = 4 studies) 1% (0–2%) 316 (0–633) N/A N/A

IQR – interquartile range, CI – confidence interval, N/A – not applicable

*The estimates are based on the number of studies that varied between 4 (for falling objects) and 67 (for drowning and asphyxia). The estimates are derived from medians and inter–quartile ranges (columns 2–3) and from epidemiological models with the highest proportion of variance explained and 95% confidence intervals (columns 4–5).



RESULTS

Our paper presented the time series with the proportional contribution of major causes of child deaths in China from 2000–2008 [4]. Using the same methods and applying the U5MR and the number of livebirths for the year 2010 for China [3,4,12,13] we arrived to the estimates presented in Table 1 . There were 314 581 deaths in children aged 0–4 years in China in 2010, and we estimated that 31 633 (10.1%) were due to accidents and injuries. There were 7240 deaths in neonates (4.0% of all neonatal deaths), 8838 deaths in post–neonatal infants (10.5% of all post–neonatal infant deaths) and 15 554 deaths in children 1–4 years (31.7% of all deaths in 1–4 years). This analysis addressed the first and second aim of this study.

Figure 1 shows the box and whiskers plot of the proportions (Y–axis) of accidental childhood deaths in China in 2010 by specific causes (X–axis): medians, inter–quartile ranges (IQR), maximum and minimum value observed in the studies that provided adequate information. The number of studies available for each cause ranged from 4 to 67. Based on medians and IQR, drowning was the leading specific cause with 34% (IQR 17–47%) of all accidental deaths, followed by asphyxia (30%; IQR 21–36%), falls (11%; IQR 6–16%), traffic accidents (11%; IQR 6–16%), poisoning (6%; IQR 4–11%), burns (2%; IQR 1–4%) and falling objects (1%; IQR 0–2%). Applied to the total number of accidental deaths (31 633), this translates into 10755 (5378–14 867) deaths attributable to drowning, 9490 (6643–11 388) to asphyxia, 3480 (1898–5061) to falls, 3480 (1898–5061) to traffic accidents, 1898 (1265–3480) to poisoning, 633 (316–1265) to burns and 316 (0–633) to falling objects. This analysis addressed the third aim of the study.

We then tried to learn more from the information available in the 76 studies. We were interested in whether any context–specific variables may accurately predict the distribution of specific causes. From each study, we extracted three predictors that were universally available: local U5MR due to all child deaths, local U5MR that was attributable to accidental deaths only, and the ratio between the latter and the former, ie, the proportional contribution of accidental deaths to all child deaths. We also developed a model that took into account all three variables. These variables were useful, because they were readily available for all provinces and for China as a whole. Table 2 presents a summary of results of epidemiological modeling, in which association between proportion of deaths due to each specific accidental cause (criterion variable) and four different predictor variables was explored. It was clear that the third model, based on the ratio between U5MR due to accidents and U5MR due to all deaths, was generally the most predictive. In Figures 2 to 6 Figure 3Figure 4Figure 5Figure 6, we present the association between this predictor and the proportion of accidental deaths due to drowning, asphyxia, traffic accidents, falls and poisoning. Data points in these figures represent studies with available information and the size of “bubbles” is proportional to the total number of child deaths observed in each study. The regression line with upper and lower limit of 95% confidence interval is shown across the range of data.

We then applied these models to the entire population of China. This implicated asphyxia as the leading cause of accidental deaths in China in 2010, with 9490 deaths (95% CI 8224–11 072), followed by drowning (5694 deaths; 95% CI 5061–6327), traffic accidents (3796 deaths; 95% CI 3163–4745), poisoning (3163 deaths; 95% CI 2531–3796) and falls (2531 deaths; 95% CI 2214–3163). Together, these 5 causes explain about 80% of all accidental deaths when modeling is primarily used, while the seven causes with available medians explain more than 95% when the analysis is based purely on medians from the 76 available studies.

Table 3 shows the differences between two sets of estimates when the two approaches are used. When modeling is used instead of medians, the role of asphyxia and traffic accidents is largely unchanged. However, drowning is revised sharply downwards, although remaining the second most important cause. Falls are also revised downwards, while poisoning is revised upwards.

DISCUSSION

Reduction in global child mortality is a leading political priority and accidental deaths will soon emerge as one of the main challenges. In this paper we provided a detailed breakdown of causes of accidental deaths in a large middle–income country. An important finding of our study is that, wherever the share of accidental deaths among all child deaths is high, drowning is more likely to be the leading cause; asphyxia seems to be equally important in all contexts, while traffic accidents, poisoning and falls are relatively more important in contexts where the overall share of accidents to all child deaths is low. There are differences in estimates based on medians and modeling. This may be explained by a predominance of studies from the areas in which the proportion of accidental deaths in all child deaths is high. It is not surprising that such contexts would attract more studies, and our analyses showed that this would favor drowning over other causes of death. This is why we believe that the estimates based on modeling are more accurate and robust. We recommend that the estimates based on modeling are considered as the more relevant ones for the whole China.

Knowledge on magnitude is the first step in the public health approach towards reducing the number of deaths from childhood accidents and unintentional injuries [14]. Without this baseline data at the national level on the profile of specific causes in children, awareness of the problem will be very limited, hindering the development of national policies [15]. Injury prevention policies are crucial for guiding preventative efforts to reduce deaths from unintentional injuries [16]. Estimating the mortality burden from accidents and injuries for children aged less than five years can highlight areas that need to be improved to generate the relevant information for policy formulation. Funding and attention in the area of unintentional injuries has not been equivalent to that of communicable and non–communicable diseases [9]. It was estimated that in the period between 2006–2007 only 1% of the WHO’s budget and an additional 1% from other sources were provided for the field of injury control and prevention [17]. Perceptions that unintentional injuries cannot be avoided also need to be challenged [18]. Interventions that have been tracked to monitor progress towards MDG4 and MDG 5 have also neglected interventions that focused on reducing preventable deaths from injuries [3,8].

Aggregating mortality data for low and middle–income countries can increase the awareness of the number of deaths caused by unintentional injuries. However, as highlighted in this study, there is a lack of country level data that underpins mortality estimates. Individual countries, and even areas within a country, can differ with regards to the leading mechanisms causing unintentional injuries, as exemplified by the range of mortality rates presented in this review [11]. For countries signatory to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, it is essential that there is greater awareness of the burden caused by unintentional injuries and focus on its redress [19]. Low and middle–income countries need to use a wide range of low cost already established information systems to collate mortality data for unintentional injuries [14,20]. Suggestions have been made that in countries where mortuaries are used to store bodies, this could be a source of injury data [20]. For instance in the year 1996 in Kumasi, Ghana, improvements were made through training of the nurses to help aid with the accurate recording of the mechanism of injury and the body region affected [15]. A review in 2006 of this mortuary showed that reporting was still high even after funding had ceased, and additional unintentional mechanisms had begun to be collected and reported [21]. Previously established demographic surveillance sites could also be used to collect data on mortalities due to injuries. Community based studies are needed to supplement these sources of data as not all deaths will reach the mortuary or be included in a surveillance sites [22,23].

Moreover, improvements need to be made with the reporting of coding that has been used to determine unintentional deaths. Separation of mechanisms that are sometimes placed into the category of ‘other unintentional’ deaths is required to allow within and country comparisons [20]. Some authors suggest that adherence to a strict division between intentional and unintentional accidents and injuries may result in common risk factors being missed [24]. In China, there seems to be a reasonably uniform system of accidents and injuries which is being used to attribute the specific cause of deaths in single–cause studies, but that system does not always easily translate into ICD–10 classification, or in classification used in other countries. There is uncertainty over the deaths caused by asphyxia in China, which seem to cause a large proportion of all deaths and it is possible that they therefore include SIDS – “sudden infant death syndrome”. However, it was not possible to learn more about this important issue from the studies themselves and further work would be needed to disentangle and characterize this category. Other categories – such as drowning, traffic accidents, falls, poisoning, burns and falling objects – are much easier to translate to other classifications.

Some middle–income countries, such as Viet Nam, have already moved towards tackling childhood unintentional injuries systematically, though specific policies. The establishment of a National Policy on Injury Prevention has resulted in an increased awareness to the problem of unintentional injuries in children in Viet Nam and has given some direction for preventative efforts [25]. Educational campaigns, swimming lessons, legislation and enforcement of helmet wearing for the population aged over 6 years and creating safer homes, schools and community environments have all been implemented to some degree throughout the country [25]. Further improvements need to be achieved in terms of enforcing current legislations, and extending the helmet legislation to those aged less than 6 years, and information systems for collecting mortality data [25]. We believe that China is very well suited to follow and make further important progress in the reduction of child mortality – which has been the most striking and successful among all the low and middle–income countries over the past two decades.

Acknowledgements

The work was partly completed during the corresponding author's employment as a Senior Research Fellow at The University of Melbourne.

Funding: KYC’s travel to China to conduct the study was supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Her salary was supported by an NHMRC Australia–China Exchange Fellowship.

Ethical approval: Not required.

Authorship declaration: KYC conceptualized the study and wrote the draft. KB conducted the literature review for all databases apart from Chinese and contributed important intellectual content. XWY and JPL conducted the review of the Chinese literature. KYC and ARD conducted the PubMed literature review. ET performed all statistical analyses.

Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

[1] L Liu, S Oza, D Hogan, J Perin, I Rudan, and JE Lawn. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post–2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385:430-40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6. [PMID:25280870]

[2] J Bryce, C Boschi–Pinto, K Shibuya, and RE Black. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71877-8. [PMID:15794969]

[3] L Liu, HL Johnson, S Cousens, J Perin, S Scott, and JE Lawn. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379:2151-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1. [PMID:22579125]

[4] I Rudan, KY Chan, JS Zhang, E Theodoratou, XL Feng, and JA Salomon. Causes of deaths in children younger than 5 years in China in 2008. Lancet. 2010;375:1083-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60060-8. [PMID:20346815]

[5] World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: WHO, 2008. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf. Accessed: 13 August 2014.

[6] Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne–Smith J, Hyder AA, Branche C, Fazlur Rahman AKM, et al. World report on child injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.

[7] World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2013. Geneva: WHO, 2013. Available: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2013_Full.pdf. Accessed: 13 August 2013.

[8] UNICEF/TASC. Towards a world safe for children: UNICEF/TASC conference on child injury. UNICEF/TASC, Thailand, 2004. Available: http://www.unicef.org/eapro/Towards_a_world_safe_for_children.pdf. Accessed: 13 August 2014.

[9] SN Bartlett. The problem of children’s injuries in low–income countries: a review. Health Policy Plan. 2002;17:1-13. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/17.1.1. [PMID:11861582]

[10] SS de Ramirez, A Hyder, H Herbert, and K Stevens. Unintentional injuries: Magnitude, prevention, and control. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:175-91. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124558. [PMID:22224893]

[11] A Chandran, AA Hyder, and C Peek–Asa. The global burden of unintentional injuries and an agenda for progress. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:110-20. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxq009. [PMID:20570956]

[12] Chinese Ministry of Health. Available: http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles Accessed: 1 August 2013.

[13] National Bureau of Statistics China. [in Chinese]. Available:http://www.stats.gov.cn Accessed: 1 August 2014.

[14] C Mock, R Quansah, R Krishnan, C Arreola–Risa, and F Rivara. Strengthening the prevention and care of injuries worldwide. Lancet. 2004;363:2172-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16510-0. [PMID:15220042]

[15] J London, C Mock, F Abantanga, R Quansah, and K Boateng. Using mortuary statistics in the development of an injury surveillance system in Ghana. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80:357-64. [PMID:12077610]

[16] Schopper D, Lormand JD, Waxweiler R. Developing policies to prevent injuries and violence: guidelines for policy–makers and planners. Geneva: WHO, 2006. Available: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/39919_oms_br_2.pdf; Accessed: 1 August 2014.

[17] A Lopez. Health and health–research priorities: has WHO got it right? Lancet. 2008;372:1525-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61632-3. [PMID:18984173]

[18] AA Hyder. Injuries in low– and middle–income countries: a neglected disease in global public health. Injury. 2013;44:579-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.028. [PMID:23375623]

[19] United Nations. Convention on the Rights of a Child. General Assembly Resolution 44/25. New York: UN, 1989.

[20] K Bhalla, K Adofo, C Mock, F Afukaar, N Appiah, and B Ebel. Non–traditional data sources for injury control: an agenda for action in Ghana. Inj Prev. 2012;18:277 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040410. [PMID:22729163]

[21] K Adofo, P Donkor, K Boateng, F Afukaar, and C Mock. Sustainable improvements in injury surveillance in Ghana. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2010;17:79-85. DOI: 10.1080/17457301003786948. [PMID:20467961]

[22] Sethi D, Habibula S, McGee K, Peden M, Bennett S, Hyder AA, et al. Guidelines for conducting community surveys on injuries and violence. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.

[23] World Health Organization. Preventing injuries and violence: A guide for ministries of health. Geneva: WHO, 2007.

[24] MD Overpeck and E McLoughlin. Did that injury happen on purpose? Does intent really matter? Inj Prev. 1999;5:11-2. DOI: 10.1136/ip.5.1.11. [PMID:10323563]

[25] S Boufous, M Ali, H Nguyen, M Stevenson, T Vu, and D Nguyen. Child injury prevention in Vietnam: achievements and challenges. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2012;19:123-9. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2011.603426. [PMID:21843102]



Journal of Global Health (ISSN 2047-2986), Edinburgh University Global Health Society
Designed by